ATW-Evaluation

Introduction The Task The Process The Due Dates Interview Questions Evaluation Resources Student Pages

Interview and Transcript Evaluation:

 * 4 || 3 || 2 || 1 ||
 * Prepares and asks relevant questions that are aptly informed by the historical context and the subject’s potential misunderstandings or biases. || Prepares and asks largely relevant questions that demonstrate an understanding, if not mastery, of the historical context and the subject’s potential misunderstandings or biases. || Prepares and asks question that demonstrate a minimal understanding of the historical context and the subjects’ potential misunderstandings or biases. || Questions and their delievery indicate little preparation and attention to historical context and the subjects’ misunderstandings or biases. ||
 * Selects subjects whose perspectives are most likely to be different and represent a widely diverse community and background. || Selects subjects whose perspectives are likely to be different. || Selects subjects whose perspectives may be more similar than different; or whose responses are selected for similarity. || Selects inappropriate subjects or reduces interviews to a level that renders different perspectives as similarin order to meet a predetermined outcome. ||
 * Demonstrates careful listening by interjecting effective follow up questions to significant responses. Effectively elicits relevant elaboration of answers. || Demonstrates attentiveness by interjecting follow-up questions to responses that may have greater significance, if pursued. May elicit some relevant elaboration of answers. || Gives little evidence of careful listening by largely ignoring potentially relevant responses and moving on to the next prepared question. Elicits little elaboration. || Gives little or no evidence of listening; marches through prepared questions without regard to responses. Does not elicit elaborated responses. ||
 * Uses language and music selections that convey maturity, sensitivity, and respect. || Uses language and music selections that, for the most part, convey maturity, sensitivity, and respect. || Uses language and music selections that are deficient in one or all of the following qualities: maturity, sensitivity, and respect. || Uses language and music selections that characteristically demonstrate little maturity, sensitivity, and respect. ||
 * Makes careful notes of interview. || Makes useful notes of the interview. || Makes few or careless notes. || Makes careless or no notes. ||
 * Demonstrates clear understanding of interview’s purpose through selection of detail included in the final podcast and written transcript. || Demonstrates, but less consistently, the interview’s purpose through selection of detail included in the final podcast and written transcript. || Suggests a weak understanding of the interview’s purpose through inclusion of irrelevancies, or details that distract from the subject’s perspective. || Suggests little or no understanding of the interview’s purpose through inclusion of irrelevancies, or details too inadequate or distracting to establish a perspective. ||
 * Presents the final podcast and written transcript in the appropriate format, demonstrating mastery recording and editing tools, of grammar, usage, and conventions. || Presents the final podcast and written transcript in the appropriate format, with a minimum of recording, editing, grammatical, or usage errors. || Presents the final podcast and written transcript in the appropriate format but one that includes distracting errors. || Presents the final podcast and written transcript in an unconventional or sloppy format with errors that impede understanding. ||