Videocast+Rubric


 * **AREA** || **Below Average (0-5)** || **Average (6-7)** || **Above Average (8)** || **Excellent (9-10)** ||
 * **Script: Interpretation of Story** || Students were not exactly correct in interpretation of the story. || Students were on the right track to understanding the story but were slightly off. || Correctly interpreted the scenes. || Correctly interpreted the scenes and added insights about text through their presentation of the scenes. ||
 * **Adaptation** || Students interpret the story literally, but superficially. || Interprets the story literally and appropriately. || Interprets the story imaginatively and appropriately. || Interprets the story creatively and with depth. ||
 * **Presentation** || Students do not seem to be aware of what they should be doing at all. || Students are reading notes off of a piece of paper and do not appear confident about what they are saying. || Students appear to be fairly prepared. || Group is well prepared and delivers presentation in an understandable and invested manner. ||
 * **Video Presentation** || None of the video was clear, concise, or well edited. Hard to understand. || Parts of video were clear, concise, and well edited. || Entire video was clear, concise, and well edited. Easy to understand. || Entire video was clear, creative, concise, and well edited. Investement in acting and production are evident. ||
 * **Argument** || Attempts to address prompt but with little or no success in establishing a focus. || Addresses the prompt by establishing an argument, though the focus may shift from the original intent or may not provide more than a general focus. || Uses the writing prompt to establish an argument (thesis) that is clearly defined and addresses the prompt completely. || Presents a clearly focused argument (thesis) that addresses the prompt thoroughly and creatively. ||
 * **Analysis, Organization, and Conclusion** || Demonstrates little or no development; usually lacks details or examples or presents irrelevant information. || Has some development but lacks specific details; may be limited to a listing, repetitions or generalizations. Analysis rarely goes beyond the surface level. || Has focused but occasionally uneven development; incorporates some specific detail but analysis generally goes beyond the surface level. || Achieves coherent development with specific and relevant details, examples, and analysis. Interpretations and explanations are insightful, original, and well organized. ||